Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers
Monday, December 14, 2009
|
|
NEW POLL: Obama -80% on fiscal policy, -28% among Independents
|
|
Posted by:
Kevin McCullough at
11:37 AM
|
 Was there EVER Presidential material there? Ok, so he slides into office on the tails of some horrible economic realities promising "hope and change." Increasingly now those who "ignorantly" voted for him... literally not pejoratively have awakened saying to themselves over and over and over again, "What the heck have I done?" 43% of Evangelicals voted for him, and he rewarded them by turning around and signing an executive order issuing millions of dollars to pay for overseas/international abortions. (In the midst of the economic meltdown!!!!!) Those who wanted Iraq stopped and Gitmo closed are both still waiting for those promises to come true. Afghanistan has had five of the six bloodiest months while waiting for President Present to make the decision that he would follow through with his earlier decision from March, (which was really the decision of the Bush administration from the previous November...) Also... he's played more golf in this "historic depression", age of "two wars", 10% unemployment/20% under-employment, etc... than his predecessor played in EIGHT YEARS! He wants to tax the methane you and your pets produce, He wants to force you to drive a battery operated car (whose production plants create worse pollution than all of the oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico combined...) and he doesn't want to hear any criticisms you might have of any of his disasters in public policies. So is it any surprise that the "passion index" for the strong approval or disapproval Americans have for him is RECORD SHATTERING? Amongst ALL the nation's voters: -19% Strongly Approve: 23% Strongly Disapprove: 42% Amongst ONLY Democrats: Strongly Approve: 41% (so less than half of JUST dems) Amongst Independents: -28% Strongly Approve: 21% Strongly Disapprove: 49% Amongst those who believe "Economy" is most important issue: -13% Strongly Approve: 26% Strongly Disapprove: 36% Amongst those who believe "Fiscal Policy" is most important issue: -80% Strongly Approve: 1% Strongly Disapprove: 81% I've said this so many times I feel like I'm insane to repeat it one more time but... Change is coming in 2010. For either Barack Obama will change his policies. Or those who have employed him as our Administrator-In-Chief, will fire many of his allies in 2010, and serve him notice that his job performance is "poor" in the mid-course review period. He's our employee... let's not let him forget that. Track KMC 24/7
|
|
|
Friday, December 11, 2009
|
|
Obamanomics...
|
|
Posted by:
John Campbell at
11:16 AM
|
|
There have been a number of recent stories exposing the complete folly of the so-called "stimulus" plan and the number of jobs claimed to have been "created or saved" by this rapacious spending undertaken by the Obama Administration. Take for instance, the 935 jobs at the Southwest Georgia Community Action Council, the administration it claimed to have 'saved', even though they really only employ 508 people. Or how about the 129 jobs that were said to have been 'created' at a childcare center in Florida when the money was actually used for employee raises, and not new jobs.
Using these methods, in Obama speak, today I created or saved 3,000 calories towards my diet. Clearly, I could have eaten 300 more calories if I tried, but I "saved" those calories due to my stimulus plan. At this rate, I could lose 100,000 calories while still gaining weight! Now, that is Obamanomics.
Well, many have already become expert 'Obamanomists.' I asked some of my constituents in Orange County, CA for their experiences using 'Obamanomics,' and I recieved many good responses, but the one below is by far my favorite. I am interested in hearing your best example of 'Obamanomics.'
Dear John:
Using Obamamath, I've just saved, nay, created a great deal of money. How? I had wanted to buy a new Lamborghini Gallardo roadster so that I could drive to the White House to personally thank our beloved President for all that he is doing to save us from financial ruin. The trip, via New Orleans in order to view the results of former President Bush's failure to forestall Hurricane Katrina, would have been an approximately 6,000-mile roundtrip.
I didn't buy the Lamborghini, as it wasn't manufactured by Government Motors. I not only saved (created) some $243,000 (including tax) by not making this purchase, but I saved (created) an additional $1,500 by not purchasing fuel for the trip.
Since both the Gallardo and its fuel would have been imported, I'm sure that the Governmental Accountability Office would classify these as "green" savings.
Thus by not buying a Lamborghini Gallardo, and not driving it to visit our President, I will have created a total of $244,500 in Green Savings. Not bad for an amateur!
But think for a moment: If each of the approximately 4 million families who live in Barack Obama's Illinois and Joe Biden's Delaware were to NOT buy a new Lamborghini, and NOT drive to the White House (via New Orleans), we would create an additional $1 trillion in new Green Wealth. Now that's Obamawealth with a vengeance!

Add Congressman Campbell on Facebook!
|
|
|
Tuesday, December 01, 2009
|
|
Barack Obama > Charlie Brown
|
|
Posted by:
Jillian Bandes at
10:54 AM
|
Obama's prime time address tonight will cover Afghanistan policy; Obama is expected to announce the infusion of 30,000 more troops despite a reluctant Democratic Congress.
Unfortunately, the address will displace ABC's long-planned viewing of A Charlie Brown Christmas. Oh, Snoopy, Linus, and Lucy...
|
|
|
Monday, November 30, 2009
|
|
Eight Percent Of Obama Cabinet Officials Have Worked In The Private Sector
|
|
Posted by:
Jillian Bandes at
8:58 AM
|
A chart out of JP Morgan compares the amount of private sector experience of Obama's officials with the private sector experience of past Presidents' cabinet officials. Between thirty and fifty-five percent of every other Presidents' officials had worked in the private sector, but only eight percent of Obama's officials have.
|
|
|
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
|
|
Obama's Foreign Policy Leaves Something - Anything - To Be Desired
|
|
Posted by:
Townhall.com Staff at
10:12 AM
|
Here's Gabor Steingart, who was embedded with the President during his recent trip to Asia.
The mood in Obama's foreign policy team is tense following an extended Asia trip that produced no palpable results. The "first Pacific president," as Obama called himself, came as a friend and returned as a stranger. The Asians smiled but made no concessions.
There were no concessions on greenhouse gas emissions. Nothing on the intentionally weak Chinese currency. Not even a thing on human rights. Obama's handlers defended him, saying expectations were too high. But is one millimeter above "nothing" too much to expect?
|
|
|
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
|
|
What happened to our global stature?
|
|
Posted by:
Kevin McCullough at
7:18 AM
|
 All that glitters? We were so inundated with this rhetorical garbage during the campaign of how terrible America's standing in the world was. (Which was farcical all along given the landslide sea change that had happened in Britain, Germany, and France during the Bush years moving from strongly anti-U.S. incumbencies to prime ministers who were strongly pro-American.) But let's keep track of President I'm-better-than-everyone-else Obama: 1. Goes to Cairo and gives a speech equating Islamic values to American values 2. Offends our British allies by giving tasteless gifts to the Queen (an iPod of his own speeches), the Prime Minister (a set of DVD's literally purchased from the White House gift shop of 25 American movies... in the wrong format to even be played in Britain... and the British people by returning the bust of Winston Churchill that they had given us in the aftermath of 9.11. 3. Glad hands Hugo Chavez at a South American summit and accepts a gift from him. 4. Sides with Castro and Chavez against the people of Honduras as the tiny nation's government attempted to enforce Constitutional law against a President who was attempting to become a dictator. 5. Kicks Israel in the teeth... several times. 6. Bows to the Saudi King. 7. Bows to the Japanese Emperor. 8. Bows to the Chinese Premiere. 9. Makes repeated concessions to Iran. 10. Offends Germany in not going to the anniversary of the felling of the Berlin wall... ironically a place he stopped to campaign from. 11. Takes so long to decide what to do in Afghanistan that our allies who desperately needed our leadership to remain strong are now fighting PR battles back in their homeland just to be able to continue to stand with us... Barack Obama suffers an enormous deficit of clarity, and its getting ugly... Track KMC 24/7
|
|
|
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
|
|
A Glimpse into the Past
|
|
Posted by:
John Campbell at
11:37 AM
|
|
You may or may not know why this blog is titled the Greeneyeshade Blog. I am a CPA by training, a self-professed bean-counter. I also sit on 3 of Committees available to Members of the House that hold jurisdiction over areas of federal economic policy, budgeting, and economic analysis. I feel it is particularly instructive that we take a look at some history…because after all, the numbers don’t lie.
- In February 2009, Democrats enacted a debt increase, with the premise and promise that by borrowing another trillion dollars would create jobs for more Americans and that it would happen immediately, thereby thwarting the unemployment rate from rising above 8%...we are now at 10.2%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, this is a 26 year high.
- Since taking control of Congress in January of 2007, Democrats have presided over a 39% increase in the nation’s debt from $8.670 trillion to $12.039 trillion.
- According to the President’s budget, the national debt will soar from $9.961 trillion at the start of 2009 to more than $24.4 trillion in 2019…that’s an increase of 144%.
|
|
|
Monday, November 23, 2009
|
|
To Congressional Dum-Dums for 2010
|
|
Posted by:
Kevin McCullough at
9:48 PM
|
 How do you spell, "Throw the bums out?" O-b-a-m-a-c-a-r-e Go ahead Democratic Congressional Representatives and Senators. Go ahead with your plan to try to bankrupt America by forcing down the peoples throats a health care plan that raises costs, raises taxes, adds TO the federal deficit, and brings job creation to an all out halt in America. Go ahead you two-faced sniveling bunch of liars who tell the American people that your bills do one thing, but then refuse to allow us to read them & when we do we find out they do just the opposite. Go ahead you snakes... Now barely 1 in 3 of we Americans even think your health care plan has any merit to it, and January is a comin'. January will be here when we start running commercials in your districts that show Shelia Jackson Lee taking a call on her blackberry--at a Townhall meeting--when a cancer survivor was trying to explain to her the intricacies of her health insurance nightmare. January will be here when we begin to target all the moderates whose arms you darn near twisted completely off in order for them to merely let you debate the bill. Those Democratic moderates all along knowing their districts were too conservative for them to vote in that fashion. January will come and the American people will finally have realized that "Hope and Change" were community organizer speak for "Bait and Switch." Go ahead Nancy, Harry, and Barack... Your choke-hold on the three biggest offices in federal elective government is coming to an end. "We the People" have given you your chance to keep your word and you couldn't even do it in the first months you were given the opportunity. Pass your bills on your party-line votes. See what happens... Go ahead... I dare you! Track KMC 24/7

|
|
|
Monday, November 23, 2009
|
|
The Borrow and Spend Runaround
|
|
Posted by:
John Campbell at
4:48 PM
|
“It is important though to recognize if we keep on adding to the debt, even in the midst of this recovery, that at some point, people could lose confidence in the U.S. economy in a way that could actually lead to a double-dip recession.”
—President Barack Obama, November 18, 2009
Recently, the White House indicated that it has plans to raise the national debt limit as part of a larger upcoming piece of legislation. What this means is that the United States Government has run out of its statutory borrowing authority…just like the credit card you have in your wallet or purse…there is a limit on what one can spend.
This is the second time in 2009 that the debt limit has been increased.
Here is a brief situation report of our economy right now:
- - The national debt has increased to $12.039 trillion or 85 % of Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
- - The debt limit was raised from $11.315 trillion to $12.104 when Speaker Pelosi and President Obama passed their ‘non-stimulating’ stimulus bill, nine months ago.
- - The government is now roughly $70 billion away from reaching the current limit.
- - The White House is now seeking a debt limit increase of at least $1 trillion to $1.5 trillion—increasing the limit to anywhere from $13.1 trillion to $13.6 trillion.
I will have more on this and a historical glimpse in the past tomorrow.
|
|
|
Thursday, November 19, 2009
|
|
Oh MY... didn't realize it was THIS bad!
|
|
Posted by:
Kevin McCullough at
5:20 PM
|
 How LOW will he go? Man this is not good... I guess bowing to other world leaders has its price huh? Or maybe just having really stinky policies that no one likes and even fewer want... Rasmussen is by far the most reliable polling mechanism out there. He's gotten the closest to the actual election results of all pollsters since 2000. But even polls that should be sympathetic to Obama have him LOSING 51%-35% on Obamacare legislation passed in the House of Representatives. And LOSING 53%-41% on his handling on health care period. And that's the GOOD NEWS... His STRONGLY approve number is now 27%, STRONGLY DISAPPROVE is 41%. Meaning those who really like him are now outnumbered by those who don't by 14%. (Ties a record.) His overall approval numbers in Quinnipiac - 41%-53%. In Rasmussen - 46%-53%. Independents - 35%-59%. Women 44%-49%. The people may like him as a person, but we seem to want NOTHING that he has to offer by way of policy. And if he keeps referring to our troops as "great photo ops" I suspect those personal numbers will begin to erode as well. Track KMC 24/7 
|
|
|
Thursday, November 19, 2009
|
|
Words a President should NEVER utter to the troops!
|
|
Posted by:
Kevin McCullough at
5:04 PM
|
"You guys make a pretty good photo op," the president said.
No President in history loved being with our troops more than the man who preceded President Obama. NEVER did those words ever cross his lips.
That one statement tells a whole world of truth about Obama's feelings, thoughts, and impressions of our service men and women and the sacrifices they make every day. Not in service to him, but to "We The People" and this nation built on liberty secured for us by those in uniform.
Mr. President, don't ever say that again... seriously. Never!
Track KMC 24/7 
|
|
|
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
|
|
Lost Track
|
|
Posted by:
John Campbell at
12:57 PM
|
|
There are some extra congressional districts in California receiving stimulus dollars…the trouble is, they don’t exist.
Recovery.gov, the web portal designed by the administration to provide transparency and information on where and how the President’s stimulus dollars were being spent lists 9 congressional districts in California that don’t exist, yet they apparently have received $5,740,757 in stimulus dollars, creating 24.2 jobs, which equates to about $237,221 per job. This odd reporting isn’t limited to California either; ABC News has reported that instances of the same problems are popping up all over the country.
When asked about the problem, Ed Pound, director of communications for recovery.gov said "We're not certifying the accuracy of the information.” Asked why recipients would pluck random numbers - 26, 45, 14 - to fill in for their congressional district, Pound replied, "who knows, man, who really knows. There are 130,000 reports out there.''
I don’t know about you, but I don’t see how the White House can allocate over $1 million in stimulus dollars to California’s 00 District, nor how you can claim to create jobs in a district that doesn’t exist…but if the White House can’t keep track of $787 billion, how are they going to track the $1.6 trillion for health care?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your Blog Postings:
|
|
Last updated 8 Minutes 29 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 8 Minutes 32 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 16 Minutes 37 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 18 Minutes 53 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 22 Minutes 3 Seconds Ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
Comments Comments
•If this is true
Re:
Breaking: Dems Threaten Nelson, Nat'l Security in Pursuit of 60 Votes
By
Darkness Fish
•The majority of the
Re:
Capitol Health Care Rally Draws Thousands
By
Seadog
•Cicero
Re:
Maybe A Letter Will Work!
By
Ronna
•Jo
Re:
Olbermann: "There is No Liberal Media"; Corporations, By Definition, Lean To The Right
By
vladimir estragon
•Tom K.
Re:
"No family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase."
By
Nee
•DanNV
Re:
Tear Gas, Prisoners At Copenhagen
By
SJA
•Mr. Borone has an
Re:
"No family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase."
By
Seadog
•Vlad is discredited
Re:
Maybe A Letter Will Work!
By
Speedicut
•ain't Nick
Re:
Tear Gas, Prisoners At Copenhagen
By
Speedicut
•Exeye's idea of "classy"
Re:
Tear Gas, Prisoners At Copenhagen
By
Saint Nick
•Wouldn't it be nice
Re:
Capitol Health Care Rally Draws Thousands
By
Saint Nick
•amazing that
Re:
Maybe A Letter Will Work!
By
eddie too
•What would Nancy say?
Re:
Tear Gas, Prisoners At Copenhagen
By
DanNV
•I wonder
Re:
Maybe A Letter Will Work!
By
Exeye
•Ronna, seriously.
Re:
Maybe A Letter Will Work!
By
Cicero
•Of course you
Re:
"No family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase."
By
John
•Photos
Re:
Capitol Health Care Rally Draws Thousands
By
Exeye
•Stay classy, leftists
Re:
Tear Gas, Prisoners At Copenhagen
By
Exeye
•Here's the letter.
Re:
Maybe A Letter Will Work!
By
toma29
•Opt In
Re:
"No family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase."
By
DanNV
|
|
|
|
The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall
|
|
|
|
|
|
|